Month: March 2023

Hi, again Derek, excellent overview of experiential learning. The abstract conceptualization component is so crucial to overlaying one experience into another. It seems daunting to have a “step” of experiential learning be the need to abstractly relate it to larger concepts and fundamental understandings of the world around us, but the good news is that I think primarily our subconscious is what does this job. This is to say, we don’t have to take what we’ve learned in experience and manually try to think of all our other experiences it relates to; instead, our brain is actively trying to draw those connections itself to make sense of the world.

On the side of the learner, the active experimentation step is seemingly the part that takes the most work. The learner has to put themselves into a learning situation that allows them to creatively apply previous experiences that they’ve learnt from and interrelate them into their ‘active experiment’. Thank you!

Hi Derek, in your explanation of behaviourism, the students would participate in behaviours such as recycling or composting that are in line with sustainable action in order to integrate their own lives into learning about climate change. In the cognitivist approach, the learners would recall the difference between a pot that boils with the lid on versus the lid off to use it as an analogy for what climate change is. Your last approach, constructivist, would allow the learners to use their own inferences from an experience to then learn how climate change works: the thermometers in two different jars. 

Thanks for your post; it helps me decipher the differences between these 3 approaches! Take care, Sam.

Blog post 4 “designing for interaction”

Hi all, this is my last blog post! Thanks for keeping in touch this semester, I hope you enjoy this post!

1. What kind of interaction would the video require from your students? Does it force them to respond in some way (inherent)?

The video called “Even Greenpeace Says “Most Plastic Simply Cannot Be Recycled.” is engaging to students through piquing interest because it shows a very contrasted opinion to what is provided in the rest of our lesson. Recycle BC promotes a narrative that encourages people to recycle as a solution. This video makes it clear that recycling is predominately beneficial for companies so they can continue to sell products contained within single-use packaging. Recycle BC was created because BC legislation demanded producer responsibility for packaging waste. Because the narrative in this video is so shocking, it is sure to cause the learner to reflect. When two narratives contrast each other, the outcome is that the Self needs to reconcile with these different narratives to understand which one makes sense. In the case of Recycle BC, it is true that they have recycling rates upwards of 80%, but it is also true that many of the products created by recycling are more accurately ‘downcycled’ products. For example, the plastic used to make a PET water bottle is likely going to be virgin plastic; it is uncommon for a recycled plastic water bottle to get a new life as another bottle of the same grade. 

3. What activity could you suggest that they do, after they have watched the video (designed)? What type of knowledge or skill would that activity help develop? What medium or technology would students use to do the activity?

In my section of the resource which focuses on the basics of recycling, my learners are asked to write a short essay or create a video podcast expressing basic comprehension of Victoria’s recycling system. In this activity they are asked to include the following factors:

-One question about sorting recycling

-One thing that surprised you about Victoria’s recycling system.

-One possible idea towards a solution for ‘the problem with recycling’

In this way, the learners will be prompted to recall information from the lesson and reinstate it in a novel form. The technologies that’ll be used for this activity are audio recording programs and Padlet.

7. How will you address any potential barriers for your learners in the use of this video to ensure an inclusive design?

By giving my learners an option to share what they’ve learned by A) writing their essay on the computer, or B) recording an audio lesson, I am designing this resource to be inclusive of a broader scope of learning abilities and academic strengths. 

5: How much work for you would that activity cause? Would the work be both manageable and worthwhile? Could the activity be scaled for larger numbers of students?

The podcast/essay activity of mine is scalable; lots of learners could partake if needed because Padlet has a lot of room. There is likewise no grading component, rather it is supposed to act as sort of a ‘town-square’ for my community of learners to engage with each other and compare key takeaways from my lesson.

Bye for now,

Sam Jensen.

Accessibility – how do we move beyond text and videos in low-engagement circumstances?

Hi from POD 5. Our interactive learning resource will be a comprehensive guide to sustainability while living in Victoria. For one of our learning activities, I plan to show our learners a couple of Youtube videos outlining the problem with recycling in general (often, products just get downcycled). In the same lesson, I will explain some unique attributes of the recycling system in Victoria and talk about some general info about our waste system. To make this learning activity, I plan to have text and videos, but for the assessment, I plan to integrate a voice memo option to describe aspects of Victorias waste system and list some general ideas that were surprising or interesting to the learner. Likewise, our learners will be asked what one thing they would change within Victoria’s waste system if they had the chance is. I am particularly excited about this last question because it will hopefully engage the learner to reflect on their own potential to make a change if they think there is a problem they could help fix.

I hope to push further into the accessibility of this lesson as we create our draft. One of the significant inaccessibility of online education is that it can be boring, and only encourage low-level thinking and reading. I think the face-to-face online discussion is one of the best ways to create engagement between learners, but this isn’t always an option. Our learning resource is made to be asynchronous, so it will be difficult to have any real-time conversation. It also depends on the types of learners are taking the online course; if the learners are simply trying to ‘check a box’ on their transcript, then it might be more difficult to engage them wholeheartedly. In contrast, if, for example, the learners is taking the course out of interest or because they want to work in a career related to the field, it might be easier to see the direct value of the course they are taking.

I think this problem of engagement is a critical one, and strongly pertains to the topic of “accessibility”; if learners have a hard time concentrating or motivating themselves to work, an online resource which is asynchronous may simply not be the best option. Alternatively, if barriers are present for in-person engagement to classes, then synchronous online classes, with real time engagement such as polls and conversations, may be a better choice.

© 2024 Sam’s Blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑